|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Scientific theories are explanations of phenomena that account for much
of the relevant empirical research findings and are created for this
purpose. These explanations are
presented in the form of propositions and postulates from which
additional hypotheses can be derived and tested in order to further
confirm or disconfirm the theories. They are then modified if research
results show a need. Theories
emerge from the research of many, and are verified by detached groups of
researchers. They are not
opinions or beliefs and are never “believed-in” by true scientists who
are skeptical and always looking for ways to improve upon current theoretical
explanations.
-
Gordon Vessels, 2005.
|
|
4
|
- 1. Free will vs. Determinism or Active Agent vs. Passive Organism: Is the free will to make choices an
illusion? Are we completely
shaped by genetic and environmental events? Are we active agents who direct,
shape, and control our own development and destiny?
- 2. Nature vs. Nurture or Stability vs. Placticity: To what extent are
we a product of our genetic
inheritance ("nature") or a product of our experiences
("nurture")? Are
people essentially programmed by their heredity and evolutionary past
or can they be effectively shaped by others through intentional acts?
- 3. Unconscious vs. Conscious Motivation: Is much or all of our behavior and
determined by unconscious factors?
Or is little or none so determined? How much of our behavior is
determined by conscious forces?
- 4. Uniqueness vs. Universality:
Are we each unique, or will psychology eventually discover laws
that explain all our behavior and our seemingly unique combinations of
personal traits?
- 5. Physiological vs. Purposive Motivation: Are we more "pushed" by
physiological needs? Are we
more "pulled" by our perceptions, knowledge, virtues,
higher-level needs, and personal goals, values, and principles?
- 6. Cultural Determinism vs. Cultural Transcendence: Do our cultures shape and
- control? Can we rise above or transcend
cultural influences? This repeats
the free-will question with specific reference to environmental as
culture.
|
|
5
|
- What is person’s role and control?
- Passive = shaped by
genetic & environmental influences
- or
- Active
= agents
- who shape, control, and direct their own development
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Nature refers to the biological make-up or genetic structure that
pre-determines (to a limited degree) each person’s attitudes, behavior,
temperament, health, intellectual potential, etc. Innate genetic influences are inherited
from our biological parents.
- Nurture refers to behaviors, attitudes, knowledge, values, etc. learned
while being raised in a specific environment. These are environmental and life
experiences that shape us through the socialization process.
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Hume saw science as an amusing pastime that revealed habits of the mind
and had no chance of producing useful explanations. He saw philosophy similarly. Bacon saw science as something that
needed to be done in order to replace doctrine and tradition with scientific
facts that could improve the human condition.
- Hume did, however, endorse Francis Bacon’s inductive method. For Bacon inductive reasoning and
experimentation were parts of the “constructive” part of his scientific
method and were the only two methods by which facts should be determined
─ “deconstruction” was the other part of his scientific method.
- Hume’s phenomenalism distinguished between sense impressions and ideas.
- Hume’s types of ideas are . . .
- Simple: directly from simple perceptions;
- cannot be false
- Complex: combination of simple ideas;
- may not match reality (skepticism)
- Hume viewed inferences about causality as
- unfounded based on the fact that two events
- have occurred together or in succession and
- have caused in people an expectation from which cause should not be
inferred.
- He rejected the concept of “self” and saw nothing in his study of the
inner workings of the mind to justify it.
- He tried to portray causality as non-existent and a matter of
conjunction and our personal expectations.
|
|
11
|
- Association of Ideas Only:
- Law of resemblance
- Thoughts run naturally from
- one idea to similar ideas
- Law of contiguity
- One object causes other objects encountered at the same time to be remembered
- Law of Cause and effect
- Effects bring up events that come before
|
|
12
|
- • Mental Physics or Mechanics of Mind
- All mental experience (ideas)
are
- sensations
- Simple ideas combine in a
simple additive’
- way to create complex ideas
- Complex ideas combine
additively to create
- more complex ideas
- • Associations
|
|
13
|
- Associationism
- Frequency
- Vividness
- Similarity –
- similar ideas
- trigger each other
- Mental chemistry
- Complex ideas have
- different properties than
simple ideas.
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Discover basic elements of sensation to which all complex processes can
be reduced;
- Determine how simple sensations are connected to form more complex
perceptions, ideas, and images;
- Involving his Law of Association
- Explain how the mind works.
|
|
22
|
- Its goal was to understand how the mind and behavior work to help an
organism adjust to
- its environment.
- William James launched Functionalism.
- It developed at two universities simultaneously:
- The University of Chicago
- John Dewey
- James Angell
- Harvey Carr
- Columbia University in New York
- James M. Cattell
- Robert Woodworth
- Edward Thorndike
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Nurture (the environment), not nature
- Principles of “learning” determine behavior change and development
- Learning (passive responses to incoming stimuli)
- Plasticity, not stability: development is gradual and continuous.
|
|
26
|
- CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
- Unconditioned stimulus -unconditioned response
- Conditioned stimulus -
- conditioned response
- OPERANT CONDITINING
- Positive & negative reinforcers
- Positive & negative punishment
- Schedules of reinforcement
- SOCIAL LEARNING
- Modeling
- Vicarious reinforcement
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- He was a trained as
- a medical doctor and
- was interested in
- blood circulation
- and digestion.
- The work that made
- Pavlov famous in
- psychology began as
- a study in digestion.
- He was looking at
- digestion in dogs: the
- relationship between salivation
- and reactions in the stomach.
- He realized they were closely linked by
- reflexes in the autonomic
nervous system.
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
- People construct their own understanding.
- People form mental representations of their world (images, schemas,
etc.)
- People are active in their environment
- Nature and Nurture interact as causes.
- Plasticity, not stability.
|
|
33
|
- 1950’s – 1970’s ─ No agreed upon date
- Ulric Neisser’s Cognitive Psychology published in 1967.
- Why did Cognitive Psychology begin?
- Two important factors:
- Dissatisfaction with behaviorism’s account
- of complex behaviors (e.g., Chomsky’s
- model of language)
- Convergence of several fields during WWII such as Linguistics, Human
Performance, Artificial Intelligence, etc.
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Nature and Nurture, as interactive causes
- Stability over plasticity: invariant, expected stages of development
- Active, not passive: children strive to resolve developmental crises
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Adler originally worked with Freud but left over the issue of sexuality
determining personality;
- Adler concluded that the need
- for power motivates people
- and shapes their personalities
- and not unconscious
- sexual drives;
- He developed what he called “individual psychology,” which was based on
the idea that people can be made aware of the many goals
- and values that guide them;
- He introduced the well-known concept of “inferiority complex.” He believed that all people at some
time feel inferior (e.g. as children) and try to compensate by seeking
experiences that give
- them power.
|
|
39
|
- Jung worked with Freud and Alder at the turn of the century, and, like
Adler, he split with Freud over the personality-sexuality connection.
- Adler originated the concepts of “extroversion” and “introversion” as
personality types or characteristics. The extrovert is
characteristically the active person who is most happy when around other
people; the introvert is typically a deliberate and contemplative person
who enjoys self-isolation and the inner world of their own ideas and
feelings.
- Jung originated the scheme of four psychological functions: sensation,
intuition, thinking and feeling.
|
|
40
|
- Erikson was interested in “human development” and “personality
development”;
- He proposed the way individuals resolve or fail to resolve
epigenetically determined developmental crises determines their traits
and virtues and how they will relate to others throughout life;
- He coined the terms “Identity Crisis” to describe the conflict within
adolescents as they consolidate social roles and values to form
- their own identities.
|
|
41
|
- Nurture, not Nature with focus on needs and interpersonal support
- Plasticity, not Stability: no predictable stages of development
- Active, not passive: children take action based on inherent growth need
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- Nature, not nurture
- Stability, not plasticity: invariant, predictable stages of development
- Passive, not active: children passively respond and adjust
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- GENETIC FACTORS
- THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
- THE BRAIN
- THE ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
- THE NEUROSCIENCE REVOLUTION
- NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
- PSYCHONEUROIMMUNOLOGY
- INTEGRATION OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|